The Comparison of Two Random Vortex Methods and Corrected SLIC Algorithm For Simulation of Combustion Flow
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63053/ijset.6Keywords:
Smart Cylinder, FGPM, Asymmetric loading, Hygrothermo-magneto-elastic response.Abstract
In this research, a combination of two random vortex methods and the corrected SLIC algorithm have been used to simulate the transient combustion flow around the cylinder. This model consists of two parts, in the first part, the random vortex method is used to solve the rotating field, and in the second part, the corrected SLIC algorithm is used to solve the flame propagation. In the initial times, a symmetric region is formed, with the passage of time, the vortices begin to dissipate, when the flow is accompanied by combustion, the vortices that form behind the cylinder are stronger.
References
Chorin, Alexander Joel, Numerical study of slightly viscous flow. Journal of Fluid Mwchanics, vol 57, part 4, pp 78-796, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112073002016
Beal J T, Majda A, Rate of convergence for viscous splitting of Navier Stokes equation. Journal of Mathematics Computation, vol 37, pp 243, 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2007424
Benfatto G, Pulvirenti M, Convergence of vorticity near the boundary in planar Navier Stokes flows. Comm Math Phys, vol 96, pp 59, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01217348
Cottet G H, Koumoutskos, Vortex method (Theory and Practice). McGraw Hill, 2000.
Ramachandran P, Development and study of high resolution two dimensional random vortex method. Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, Chennai, 4002.
Cantwell B J, Coles D, A flying hot wire study of the turbulent near wake of a circular cylinder at Re=140000. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technologhy, 1976.
Prabhu R, Development and study of a high resolution two dimentional random vortex method . Ph.D. These, Department Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, 2004.
Chorine A J, Vortex sheet approximation of boundry layers. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol 27, pp 428, 1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(78)90019-0
Chawdhury, S., Morgenthal, G., 2015. Flow reproduction using vortex particle methods for wake buffeting analysis of bluff structures. In: ICFMA 2015: 17th International Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Applications.
Cottet, G.H., Koumoutsakos, P.D., 2000. Vortex Methods: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526442
Ge, Y., Xiang, H., 2008. Computational models and methods for aerodynamic flutter of long-span bridges. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96, 1912–1924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.017
Hejlesen, M.M., Rasmussen, J.T., Larsen, A., Walther, J.H., 2015. On estimating the aerodynamic admittance of bridge sections by a mesh-free vortex method. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 146, 117–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2015.08.003
Ibrahim, K., Morgenthal, G., Chawdhury, S., 2014. Wake flow reproduction in vortex particle methods for simulating buffeting response. In: The 6th International Symposium on Computational Wind Engineering—CWE2014.
Irwin, P.A., 2008. Bluff body aerodynamics in wind engineering. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96, 701–712. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2007.06.008
Koumoutsakos, P., Leonard, A., 1995. High-resolution simulations of the flow around an impulsively started cylinder using vortex methods. J. Fluid Mech. 296, 1–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112095002059
Larsen, A., Walther, J.H., 1997. Aeroelastic analysis of bridge sections based on discrete vortex simulations. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 67–68, 253–265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(97)00077-9
Larsen, A., Walther, J.H., 1998. Discrete vortex simulation of flow around five generic bridge deck sections. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 77, 591–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(98)00175-5
Liu, Z., Kopp, G.A., 2011. High-resolution vortex particle simulations of flows around rectangular cylinders. Comput. Fluids 40, 2–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.07.011
McRobie, A., Morgenthal, G., Abrams, D., Prendergast, J., 2013. Parallels between wind and crowd loading of bridges. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 371, 20120430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0430
Morgenthal, G., 2002. Aerodynamic Analysis of Structures using High-resolution Vortex Particle Methods (Ph.D. thesis), University of Cambridge.
Morgenthal, G., 2005. Advances in numerical bridge aerodynamics and recent applications. Struct. Eng. Int. (IABSE) 15, 95–100. Morgenthal, G., Corriols, A.S., Bendig, B., 2014. A GPU-accelerated pseudo-3D vortex method for aerodynamic analysis. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 125, 69–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.12.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International journal of Modern Achievement in Science, Engineering and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.