Development of a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework (AHP-TOPSIS) for evaluating and selecting optimal restoration solutions (digital and physical)

Authors

  • Vahid Taher Khani 1. Bachelor of Professional Engineering in Industrial Safety (HSE) and Master of Industrial Engineering in Engineering Management from Isfahan University of Technology
  • Faezeh Lorestani 2. Bachelor of applied Chemistry and Master of medical biochemistry and industrial engineering in Engineering Management from Isfahan University of Technology
  • Mohammad Javad Arabnejad 3. Bachelor of industrial engineering and Master of industrial engineering in Engineering Management from Isfahan University of Technology
  • Masoomeh Zarei 4. Bachelor of Economics and Master of Industrial Engineering in Engineering Management from Isfahan University of Technology
  • Mohammad Shafieian 5. Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering and Master of Industrial Engineering in Engineering Management from Isfahan University of Technology
  • Meysam Sharifi 6. Bachelor of industrial engineering and Master of industrial engineering in Engineering Management from Isfahan University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63053/ijset.136

Keywords:

Multi-criteria decision making, AHP, TOPSIS, building renovation, digital solutions

Abstract

Sustainable development and energy efficiency improvement in the building sector require complex and multifaceted decision-making in the renovation process. Aiming to overcome the challenges of evaluating multiple renovation options that include both physical changes (such as insulation and mechanical systems) and the integration of digital solutions (such as smart energy management systems), this research develops a novel hybrid framework based on multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. The framework combines the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to extract and accurately weight the evaluation criteria – considering economic, technical, environmental and occupant comfort dimensions – and the TOPSIS method to finally rank the solutions. AHP ensures that the weights of the criteria reflect the real preferences of the stakeholders, while TOPSIS makes the selection process transparent and repeatable by identifying the optimal solution close to the ideal solution. The application of this model to a residential renovation example demonstrates its effectiveness in selecting the most optimal combination package to increase building performance and resource efficiency.

References

A multi-criteria decision-making framework for residential building renovation using pairwise comparison and TOPSIS methods

Multi-criteria decision making in evaluating digital retrofitting solutions: utilising AHP and TOPSIS

Published

2026-02-02

How to Cite

Taher Khani, V., Lorestani, F., Arabnejad, M. J., Zarei, M., Shafieian, M., & Sharifi , M. (2026). Development of a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework (AHP-TOPSIS) for evaluating and selecting optimal restoration solutions (digital and physical). International Journal of Modern Achievement in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.63053/ijset.136

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)