Optimization of Seismic Behavior of Adjacent Buildings in Response to Impact Loads

Mahdi  Aliyari

doi:10.63053/ijset.42

Authors

Mahdi Aliyari Department of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Shahbastar Branch, Shahbastar, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63053/ijset.42

Keywords:

Structural Behavior, Adjacent Buildings, Impact Loads, Earthquakes

Abstract

This study explores optimization strategies for the seismic behavior of adjacent buildings under impact and seismic loads. With construction rapidly expanding in densely populated urban environments, accurately analyzing the dynamic response of these structures is crucial. The research begins by identifying key factors that influence seismic behavior, followed by an examination of the dynamic responses of the buildings subjected to various loading conditions. Additionally, this analysis utilizes both analytical models and numerical simulations to assess performance comprehensively. The results reveal that maintaining adequate spacing between buildings, selecting appropriate materials, and implementing effective structural designs can significantly mitigate damage from seismic and impact forces. Notably, a sensitivity analysis indicates that even minor adjustments in design parameters can lead to considerable improvements in structural performance. In conclusion, the study offers practical recommendations aimed at enhancing the design and construction practices of adjacent buildings, thereby improving their safety and stability in the face of natural disasters. These valuable findings provide detailed insights for engineers and architects striving to bolster structural safety and also minimize the risks associated with earthquakes and impact loads. Eventually, By integrating these recommendations, the resilience of urban structures can be significantly improved, ensuring better protection for occupants and communities alike.

References

Abdel Raheem, S. E. (2014). Mitigation measures for earthquake induced pounding effects on seismic performance of adjacent buildings. Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 12, 1705-1724.

B. Sołtysik, R.J.I.J.o.E.S. Jankowski, Engineering, Non-linear strain rate analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between steel buildings, 6 (2013) 429-433.

Basili, M., & De Angelis, M. (2007). Optimal passive control of adjacent structures interconnected with nonlinear hysteretic devices. Journal of sound and vibration, 301(1-2), 106-125.

Bertero, V. V. (2019). Performance-based seismic engineering: A critical review of proposed guidelines. Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, 1-31.

Bhaskararao, A. V., & Jangid, R. S. (2006). Seismic response of adjacent buildings connected with friction dampers. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 4, 43-64.

Brodsky, A., & Yankelevsky, D. Z. (2017). Resistance of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill walls to in-plane gravity loading due to loss of a supporting column. Engineering Structures, 140, 134-150.

Building Seismic Safety Council (US), & Applied Technology Council. (1997). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (Vol. 1). Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Code, T. E. (2007). Turkish earthquake code-specification for structures to be built in disaster areas. Ankara, Turkey.

Elwardany, H., Mosa, B., Khedr, M., & Seleemah, A. (2022). Effect of earthquake induced-pounding on the response of four adjacent buildings in series. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 83(2), 153-166.

FEMA 356, F. E. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC, USA.

Ghaderi, P., Khosravi, H., & Firoozjaee, A. R. (2020). Consideration of strength-stiffness dependency in the determination of lateral load pattern. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 137, 106287.

Kamal, M., & Inel, M. (2022). Simplified approaches for estimation of required seismic separation distance between adjacent reinforced concrete buildings. Engineering Structures, 252, 113610.

Kandemir-Mazanoglu, E. C., & Mazanoglu, K. (2015). Parametric study on implementation of viscous dampers for adjacent buildings. In DSTA 2015 Conference Book: Dynamical Systems–Mechatronics and Life Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 313-322).

Kim, J., Ryu, J., & Chung, L. (2006). Seismic performance of structures connected by viscoelastic dampers. Engineering structures, 28(2), 183-195.

Kitayama, S., & Constantinou, M. C. (2018). Seismic performance of buildings with viscous damping systems designed by the procedures of ASCE/SEI 7-16. Journal of Structural Engineering, 144(6), 04018050.

Mousavi, S. M., Ellsworth, W. L., Zhu, W., Chuang, L. Y., & Beroza, G. C. (2020). Earthquake transformer—an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking. Nature communications, 11(1), 3952.

Mohamed, H., & Romao, X. (2021). Seismic fragility functions for non-seismically designed RC structures considering pounding effects. Buildings, 11(12), 665.

Pertile, V., Stella, A., De Stefani, L., & Scotta, R. (2021). Seismic and energy integrated retrofitting of existing buildings with an innovative ICF-based system: design principles and case studies. Sustainability, 13(16), 9363.

Taranath, B. S. (2016). Tall building design: steel, concrete, and composite systems. CRC press.

Varum, H., Dumaru, R., Furtado, A., Barbosa, A. R., Gautam, D., & Rodrigues, H. (2018). Seismic performance of buildings in Nepal after the Gorkha earthquake. In Impacts and insights of the Gorkha earthquake (pp. 47-63). Elsevier.

Waheeb, M. I., & Hemeida, F. A. (2022). Study of natural ventilation and daylight in a multi-storey residential building to address the problems of COVID-19. Energy Reports, 8, 863-880.

Xu, Y. L., He, Q., & Ko, J. M. (1999). Dynamic response of damper-connected adjacent buildings under earthquake excitation. Engineering Structures, 21(2), 135-148.

Zhao, X., Zhou, Y., & Bao, L. (2023). A stability-based energy-dissipation design method of viscoelastic dampers. Engineering Structures, 286, 116109.